On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:23:39AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On 11/08/2016 06:01 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > >> I'm all for investigating possibilities, especially ones which have no > > >> performance impact and reach. We should do everything we can, and we > > >> certainly *do* provides stickers and other Fedora swag. We need to work > > >> on the contrbutions of the desktop visual appearance to our brand > > >> identity as well. > > > > > > I think that being the best GNOME Workstation distributor would go a long > > > way towards making Fedora the de facto choice for GNOME use, and that would > > > likely be more effective than slapping non-upstream logos in places. > > > > What I think Matthew and I are trying to say is that this is a very limited > > and > > GNOME-centric perspective. Fedora is more than just GNOME. It has to be, > > otherwise what is the point? You can run GNOME on dozens of other > > distributions. > > You can run it with as good an integration as Fedora on... well, Fedora and > spins/remixes. That's a valid point. Ubuntu is Unity, and Debian's popcon indicates only 30% installations have gnome-shell. But Fedora has gnome-shell in majority of installations, so it's justified to say that Fedora is Gnome, and Gnome is Fedora. I don't see what the big issue about the background logo is: it is small, unobtrusive, and a lot like a sticker ;) So yeah, let's work on the best possible integration of Gnome and Fedora, and not attach too much weight to details like that: after all it's not something that users complain about. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
