Re: Improving Offline Updates (WAS Re: I asked Hacker News what developers want from a desktop, and this is what they said)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> So, good news! This is in fact already possible to do today, as I just tested.
> The following set of commands does exactly this:
>
> ```
> pkcon refresh force
> pkcon update --only-download
> pkcon offline-trigger
> systemctl isolate system-update.target
> ```
>
> This all runs in the current boot and will trigger a reboot immediately after
> the update completes. All of this should be easily possible to do for
> Workstation within GNOME Software if we agree that's easier on the end-user.

Cool. Are the sysfs leak concerns by systemd folks considered minor?
Is there any advantage to running this in an nspawn container if
that's a cleaner environment?

I asked about this on the ostree list and it looks like they're doing
this with bubblewrap, although I can't comment on the qualitative
difference, if any.
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ostree-list/2016-October/msg00021.html


>> There's also kexec: with recent kernels kexec does not work for me anymore
>> (graphics crash). Nevertheless, kexec is something worth considering too:
>> the state is reset quite thoroughly, and we avoid the potentially very
>> slow POST.
>
> 2.0

I thought kexec was disabled for this purpose, at least on UEFI Secure
Boot enabled computers?



-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux