On 03/23/2016 11:23 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 14:03 +0100, Misha Shnurapet wrote: >> That being said, a component of Evolution demands laptop's processing >> power despite of Evolution being uninstalled. It's become essential to >> the desktop environment, I know, I know. But maybe for the sake of >> clarity it is time it changed its name to gnome-data-server? > > Hi, > the development of the data server begun as part of the evolution, thus > it was named evolution-data-server. It was never aimed to be only for > the evolution, as far as I know. It is not part of it at all too. > > It seems to me that you claim only about the used name, that the > "evolution-data-server" looks odd for you due to the "evolution" part > of the name, which is there only for the historical reasons. I do not > think the rename to "gnome-data-server" is good for anything, even KDE > applications can use the evolution-data-server, aka when you do not run > GNOME at all. > > There is no gain in the rename from my point of view, only too much > paper work and administration to adapt not only Fedora, but also > upstream parts, 3rd party projects, .... It doesn't worth the effort > and wasted time, from my point of view, because there are more > important things to be done. Like the (client) application doesn't mind > that much what structure name it'll use to get its calendar/address > book data, as long as it gets to that data. I mean, better focus on > functionality, than on paper work. > <bikeshed> Perhaps "data-server-evolved" </bikeshed>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
