On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 14:03 +0100, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > That being said, a component of Evolution demands laptop's processing > power despite of Evolution being uninstalled. It's become essential to > the desktop environment, I know, I know. But maybe for the sake of > clarity it is time it changed its name to gnome-data-server? Hi, the development of the data server begun as part of the evolution, thus it was named evolution-data-server. It was never aimed to be only for the evolution, as far as I know. It is not part of it at all too. It seems to me that you claim only about the used name, that the "evolution-data-server" looks odd for you due to the "evolution" part of the name, which is there only for the historical reasons. I do not think the rename to "gnome-data-server" is good for anything, even KDE applications can use the evolution-data-server, aka when you do not run GNOME at all. There is no gain in the rename from my point of view, only too much paper work and administration to adapt not only Fedora, but also upstream parts, 3rd party projects, .... It doesn't worth the effort and wasted time, from my point of view, because there are more important things to be done. Like the (client) application doesn't mind that much what structure name it'll use to get its calendar/address book data, as long as it gets to that data. I mean, better focus on functionality, than on paper work. Just my opinion. Bye, Milan -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
