Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2 February 2014 19:57, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> /boot is (on basically every Fedora system deployed so far) not FAT, so
> if your bootloader doesn't read any other filesystems it's not going to
> be able to boot a kernel.

Is a FAT /boot such a bad thing? Is there a good reason why gummiboot
only supports FAT and not something like ext2?

> LoadImage() is problematic because Fedora
> kernels aren't signed with a key that the firmware trusts, so the
> firmware will refuse to load the kernel.

So you have to load a new key before installing? Is this such a bad
thing? Sorry for all the newbie questions.

Richard.
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux