Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 1 February 2014 22:22, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> gummiboot really isn't suitable as a Fedora bootloader. Its inability to
> read non-FAT filesystems is an absolute showstopper, as is its reliance
> on LoadImage()/ExecuteImage() for starting the kernel.

Hi, I'm somewhat of a UEFI newbie; could you elaborate a little why
non-FAT is required and why LoadImage() is a bad thing?

Thanks,

Richard.
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux