On 1 February 2014 22:22, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > gummiboot really isn't suitable as a Fedora bootloader. Its inability to > read non-FAT filesystems is an absolute showstopper, as is its reliance > on LoadImage()/ExecuteImage() for starting the kernel. Hi, I'm somewhat of a UEFI newbie; could you elaborate a little why non-FAT is required and why LoadImage() is a bad thing? Thanks, Richard. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop