On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1 February 2014 22:22, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> gummiboot really isn't suitable as a Fedora bootloader. Its inability to >> read non-FAT filesystems is an absolute showstopper, as is its reliance >> on LoadImage()/ExecuteImage() for starting the kernel. > > Hi, I'm somewhat of a UEFI newbie; could you elaborate a little why > non-FAT is required [...] Because Apple does not use FAT for UEFI partitons (they are HFS+). -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
