Re: The new gnome-software application

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 7 March 2013 11:27, Allan Day <allanpday@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> First of all, it is important that the Software application can be
> used without long lag times, delays or (worse) locks. This applies to
> almost all aspects of the application:

100% agree.

> With my downstream hat on, I would say that one of the big issues with
> the GNOME PackageKit front ends on Fedora is yum locks.

Fedora basically has three options here:
 * Make yum be able to run system transactions run in parallel like Zif
 * Install applications in Glick2 bundles rather than packages and
sidestep rpm completely
 * Actually install the applications once the user has finished
browsing (which would suck)

> Does anyone know who we should be talking to?

The yum developers I've talked to about parallel transactions do not
want to cater to this use-case. I'm not having the same argument I had
2 years ago, so I'll leave things at that.

> Obviously it
> should be possible to see your installed applications and remove them
> when you are offline.

Agreed, we can do that now.

> available. That said, I think it is acceptable to offer a reduced
> experience when offline, whether that means not showing the full range
> of information about applications, not providing search functionality,
> or limiting app installation to online only.

My current plan was to allow searching for software, but things like
screenshots, tags and ratings would be unavailable.

Richard
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux