drago01 (drago01@xxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5 March 2013 20:02, Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Does this mean that the Application data will be something that Fedora will > >> need to host in addition to the data already in the packages? > > > > Depends if Fedora wants to have application icons and translated > > descriptions > > I still don't understand the whole fuzz about that .. it can't be that > hard to ship a bunch of icons and text ... Mainly that it becomes a pain in the ass to update, what do you do about themed icons, and the logical silliness of a package that says: License: GPL and LGPLv2 and LGPLv2+ and MPL and WTFPL and ASL2.0 and GPLv3 and GPLv3+ and LGPLv3 and X11 and MIT and You'reAPepperToo Bill -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
