On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > drago01 (drago01@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 5 March 2013 20:02, Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Does this mean that the Application data will be something that Fedora will >> >> need to host in addition to the data already in the packages? >> > >> > Depends if Fedora wants to have application icons and translated >> > descriptions >> >> I still don't understand the whole fuzz about that .. it can't be that >> hard to ship a bunch of icons and text ... > > Mainly that it becomes a pain in the ass to update, what do you do about > themed icons, and the logical silliness of a package that says: See my other mail ... this is a technical rather than a legal problem really. We just have to collect the license tags when building it an put it *somewhere* where somewhere does not have to be the spec file (it could just reference to "somewhere"). -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
