On Wed 06 Mar 2013 11:10:44 AM EST, Bill Nottingham wrote:
drago01 (drago01@xxxxxxxxx) said:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5 March 2013 20:02, Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does this mean that the Application data will be something that Fedora will
need to host in addition to the data already in the packages?
Depends if Fedora wants to have application icons and translated
descriptions
I still don't understand the whole fuzz about that .. it can't be that
hard to ship a bunch of icons and text ...
Mainly that it becomes a pain in the ass to update, what do you do about
themed icons, and the logical silliness of a package that says:
License: GPL and LGPLv2 and LGPLv2+ and MPL and WTFPL and ASL2.0 and
GPLv3 and GPLv3+ and LGPLv3 and X11 and MIT and You'reAPepperToo
Bill
Also, wouldn't a single package that bundles a bunch of icons in it be
somewhere on the larger side, MB-wise?
cheers,
ryanlerch
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
