[CCing the other net maintainers]
On 25.06.24 10:51, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 25/06/24 07:56, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) ha
> scritto:
>> On 17.06.24 13:08, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> On 17/06/2024 11:33, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
>>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>> It looks more and more like we are stuck here (or was there progress and
>> I just missed it?) while the 6.10 final is slowly getting closer. Hence:
>>
>> AngeloGioacchino, should we ask the net maintainers to revert
>> 868ff5f4944aa9 ("net: dsa: mt7530-mdio: read PHY address of switch from
>> device tree") for now to resolve this regression? Reminder, there is
>> nothing wrong with that commit per se afaik, it just exposes a problem
>> that needs to be fixed first before it can be reapplied.
>
> To be clear on this: I asked for the commit to be fixed such that it
> guarantees
> backwards compatibility with older device trees.
>
> If no fix comes,
I haven't see any since that mail, did you? If not, I think...
> then I guess that we should ask them to revert this commit
> until a fix is available.
...it's time to ask them for the revert to resolve this for -rc7 (and
avoid a last minute revert), or what do you think?
> I don't like this situation, either, btw.
I guess none of us does. :-/
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
#regzbot poke
