On 11/06/2024 14:30, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 07.06.24 16:15, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 07.06.24 16:03, Paolo Abeni wrote:
On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 10:26 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 31.05.24 08:10, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 31/05/2024 08.40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
[adding Paolo, who committed the culprit]
/me slowly wonders if the culprit should be reverted for now (see below)
and should be reapplied later together with the matching changes from
Arınç ÜNAL.
FWIS I think a revert should be avoided, given that a fix is available
and nicely small.
Yeah, on one hand I agree; but on the other it seems that the
maintainers that would have to take care of the dt changes to fix this
until now remained silent in this thread, apart from Rob who sent the
mail regarding the warnings.
I put those maintainers in the To: field of this mail, maybe that might
lead to some reaction.
Still no reply from the DRS folks or any other progress I noticed. Guess
that means I will soon have no other choice than to get Linus involved,
as this looks stuck. :-( #sigh
Does it have to be Linus that needs to apply "[PATCH 0/2] Set PHY address
of MT7531 switch to 0x1f on MediaTek arm64 boards"? Aren't there any other
ARM maintainers that can apply the fix to their tree?
Arınç
