On 07.06.24 16:15, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 07.06.24 16:03, Paolo Abeni wrote: >> On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 10:26 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> On 31.05.24 08:10, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: >>>> On 31/05/2024 08.40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>>> [adding Paolo, who committed the culprit] >>> >>> /me slowly wonders if the culprit should be reverted for now (see below) >>> and should be reapplied later together with the matching changes from >>> Arınç ÜNAL. >> >> FWIS I think a revert should be avoided, given that a fix is available >> and nicely small. > > Yeah, on one hand I agree; but on the other it seems that the > maintainers that would have to take care of the dt changes to fix this > until now remained silent in this thread, apart from Rob who sent the > mail regarding the warnings. > > I put those maintainers in the To: field of this mail, maybe that might > lead to some reaction. Still no reply from the DRS folks or any other progress I noticed. Guess that means I will soon have no other choice than to get Linus involved, as this looks stuck. :-( #sigh Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
