Hi, i can confirm that daniels patch pointed by arinc fixes driver for the wrong devicetree on BPI-R64. but there are concerns from the netdev/dsa maintainers in its current state https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/11f5f127d0350e72569c36f9060b6e642dfaddbb.1714514208.git.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ regards Frank > Gesendet: Montag, 01. Juli 2024 um 08:16 Uhr > Von: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > An: "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Daniel Golle" <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Frank Wunderlich" <linux@xxxxxxxxx>, "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Rob Herring" <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Linux regressions mailing list" <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt7622: fix switch probe on bananapi-r64 > > [CCing the other net maintainers] > > On 25.06.24 10:51, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > > Il 25/06/24 07:56, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) ha > > scritto: > >> On 17.06.24 13:08, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: > >>> On 17/06/2024 11:33, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) > >>> wrote: > >>> [...] > >> It looks more and more like we are stuck here (or was there progress and > >> I just missed it?) while the 6.10 final is slowly getting closer. Hence: > >> > >> AngeloGioacchino, should we ask the net maintainers to revert > >> 868ff5f4944aa9 ("net: dsa: mt7530-mdio: read PHY address of switch from > >> device tree") for now to resolve this regression? Reminder, there is > >> nothing wrong with that commit per se afaik, it just exposes a problem > >> that needs to be fixed first before it can be reapplied. > > > > To be clear on this: I asked for the commit to be fixed such that it > > guarantees > > backwards compatibility with older device trees. > > > > If no fix comes, > > I haven't see any since that mail, did you? If not, I think... > > > then I guess that we should ask them to revert this commit > > until a fix is available. > > ...it's time to ask them for the revert to resolve this for -rc7 (and > avoid a last minute revert), or what do you think? > > > I don't like this situation, either, btw. > > I guess none of us does. :-/ > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > -- > Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr > If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. > > #regzbot poke >
