Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: document Amlogic S4 SoC PLL & peripheral clock controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Kevin,

On 2023/1/19 8:38, Kevin Hilman wrote:
[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]

Yu Tu <yu.tu@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On 2023/1/16 16:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

[...]

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bbec5094d5c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */

Unusual license... are you sure to license the bindings under GPLv4 or
GPLv5? Fine by me.


Yes.

The rest of the bindings for Amlogic SoCs are GPL-2.0 (without the '+').
Adding the dual-license for MIT seems fine, but adding the '+' is
curious.

It would be helpful if you could please explain why you'd like these
bindings to be licensed differently than the rest of the SoC family.


I actually refer to the previous g12a Soc.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc4/source/include/dt-bindings/clock/g12a-clkc.h
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc4/source/include/dt-bindings/clock/axg-clkc.h
[...]

So if you think it is not necessary, I will delete the '+' as you suggested. Don't know what you choose?

Kevin




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux