Yu Tu <yu.tu@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2023/1/16 16:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: [...] >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..bbec5094d5c3 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h >>> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */ >> >> Unusual license... are you sure to license the bindings under GPLv4 or >> GPLv5? Fine by me. >> > > Yes. The rest of the bindings for Amlogic SoCs are GPL-2.0 (without the '+'). Adding the dual-license for MIT seems fine, but adding the '+' is curious. It would be helpful if you could please explain why you'd like these bindings to be licensed differently than the rest of the SoC family. Kevin