Re: Why you might want packages not containers for Ceph deployments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What I am getting from reading 'between the lines'. Is that they want to create something that is easier to install for a broader target audience. 
And instead of just saying this, for whatever reasoning other arguments have been put forward which are questionable and therefore raise a discussion here.

Thanks for the link and info!

> > *If* this this really about complexity of package building, why did
> you
> > not shout out to the community and ask for help? I assume that one or
> > the other party on this mailing list is open for helping out.
> 
> If I may chime in, package building and hosting for open source projects
> is solved with the openSUSE build service:
> 
> https://build.opensuse.org/
> 
> But I think what Sage meant was e.g. different versions of GCC on the
> distributions and not being able to use all the latest features needed
> for compiling Ceph.
> 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux