Re: Why you might want packages not containers for Ceph deployments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Sage,

Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Thank you for bringing this up.  This is in fact a key reason why the
> orchestration abstraction works the way it does--to allow other
> runtime environments to be supported (FreeBSD!
> sysvinit/Devuan/whatever for systemd haters!)

I would like you to stop labeling people who have reasons for not using
a specific software as haters.

It is not productive to call Ceph developers "GlusterFS haters", nor to
call Redhat users Debian haters.

It is simple not an accurate representation.

Cheers,

Nico

--
Sustainable and modern Infrastructures by ungleich.ch
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux