Re: Why you might want packages not containers for Ceph deployments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:27 AM Nico Schottelius
<nico.schottelius@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey Sage,
>
> Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Thank you for bringing this up.  This is in fact a key reason why the
> > orchestration abstraction works the way it does--to allow other
> > runtime environments to be supported (FreeBSD!
> > sysvinit/Devuan/whatever for systemd haters!)
>
> I would like you to stop labeling people who have reasons for not using
> a specific software as haters.
>
> It is not productive to call Ceph developers "GlusterFS haters", nor to
> call Redhat users Debian haters.
>
> It is simple not an accurate representation.

You're right, and I apologize.  My intention was to point out that we
tried to keep the door open to everyone, even those who might be
called "haters", but I clearly missed the mark.

sage
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux