> > This thread would not be so long if docker/containers solved the > problems, but it did not. It solved some, but introduced new ones. So we > cannot really say its better now. The only thing I can deduct from this thread, is the necessity to create a solution for eg. 'dentists' to install a ceph cluster. Everything really related to container use is moved to the future. The focus of the cephadm development more or less shows this. > > > Again, I think focus should more on a working ceph with clean > documentation while leaving software management, packages to admins. And > staticilly linked binaries would certinly solve dependecy hell and "how > to support other environments" for most of the cases. > I agree, and I worry that at some point only docker images are going to be available, and/or a CO environment that I do not want. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |