On 11/15/18 10:08 PM, Patrick Donnelly wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:53 PM Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> In the case of ceph-volume, I may have misrepresented our way of >> linking issues. It is not that we are not creating issues for each >> defect and slapping regressions onto the old issue, it is that we >> add the backport PR links as comments, hence the question if it was >> possible to add more than 1 link. >> >> Not that it should stop this from moving forward, we can workaround >> it or improve it in some other way. > > I'd recommend using the related/blocking issue feature instead of > linking to another PR. It makes more sense and it doesn't present an > ambiguous situation to the backporter (why is this second PR linked? > was there a problem with the first PR or is this just a follow-up > enhancement? etc.). That would have been my suggestion as well. Instead of adding links to backport PRs in the comments, I'd recommend using the built-in relationships between issues in Redmine. Lenz -- SUSE Linux GmbH - Maxfeldstr. 5 - 90409 Nuernberg (Germany) GF:Felix Imendörffer,Jane Smithard,Graham Norton,HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
