On 11/13/18 1:08 PM, Alfredo Deza wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:48 AM Lenz Grimmer <lgrimmer@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Ken, >> >> On 11/12/18 10:02 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> >>> Sometimes we have multiple PRs that end up fixing one issue. Can we >>> make this field handle that? >> >> Is that a very common case? Right now, this field only accepts a single >> number. If multiple PRs fix the same issue, the issue may be a bit too >> broad in scope and could be broken up into subtasks instead? > > We do this all the time in ceph-volume. Then I'm afraid that this new field won't be very useful for you - it can only store one PR ID. I could not find a way to add a custom field that expects multiple values while maintaining a way to convert them into a clickable URL. >> Otherwise, it's still possible to mention additional PRs in the comment >> section (as it's currently done). > > This is what we currently do. Which is not ideal I see. I currently cannot offer a solution other than suggesting to either split up the issue into subtasks that map to the corresponding PRs, or to continue mentioning additional PRs in the comments :/ Lenz -- SUSE Linux GmbH - Maxfeldstr. 5 - 90409 Nuernberg (Germany) GF:Felix Imendörffer,Jane Smithard,Graham Norton,HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
