Yes, absolutely! And the backports for the original issue should be blocked by the fix for the follow-up issue. This should be strictly managed by the PTL for the respective project.
Thanks, Patrick.
I'm 100% against having multiple PRs in a single issue. It just makes things more confusing. It's lazy software engineering and we shouldn't enable it.
I agree 1000% with Patrick and Lenz that there should be a 1:1 relationship between tracker issues and PRs (including in the backport tracker). Cases where master issues are reopened and follow-up PRs tacked on have been a bane of the backporters' existence for a long time.
Once this 1:1 relationship is enforced for master issues, the related backport issues will automatically fall into line.
Nathan
