On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:01 AM Lenz Grimmer <lgrimmer@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11/15/18 6:40 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > > > I think part of the problem domain here isn't just bugs that > > deliberately take up multiple PRs, but bugs where the first fix is > > incorrect or incomplete and needs to be amended by a later patch. > > Well, but that would deserve getting tracked in a separate issue > (flagged as "regression" and referring to the original issue), wouldn't it? Yes, absolutely! And the backports for the original issue should be blocked by the fix for the follow-up issue. This should be strictly managed by the PTL for the respective project. I'm 100% against having multiple PRs in a single issue. It just makes things more confusing. It's lazy software engineering and we shouldn't enable it. Thanks Lenz for taking the initiative to add this. -- Patrick Donnelly
