RE: disk enclosure LEDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm indifferent to agent vs. agent-less.

I *believe* that having a ceph-private distribution is easier/simpler/more reliable than trying to layer over some other system (ansible, salt, etc.) [i.e., I agree with John]. But this isn't a strongly held belief.

I'm *metaphysically certain* that whatever distribution scheme is adopted that it not be optional. A large barrier to adoption of Ceph today is the lack of "middle-ware" that handles infrequent operational events (node addition/removal, media failure/recovery, migration, etc.). IMO, this middle-ware will have to be a standard part of Ceph, i.e., fully functional "out of the  box" without site-specific twiddling (though having a mechanism to insert site-specific stuff is fine with me, it just can't be *required*). 

In my mind, the distribution scheme is the next step in the evolution of Ceph-mgr. It's what's missing :)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bassam Tabbara
> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 9:48 AM
> To: John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@xxxxxxxx>; Ceph Development <ceph-
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: disk enclosure LEDs
> 
> > Yes, although only a tiny part of what tools like ansible do -- and in
> > the process, we save the effort of integrating with all of the above.
> > IMHO it would actually be better value for money to write our own
> > agent than to maintain and test a pluggable infrastructure that could
> > use any of them (especially as some have different semantics), and
> > handle newer/older versions of them, etc.
> 
> Calmari was using salt stack (among other things). I agree with John that
> Ceph should have its own simple story for management. I just hope that it
> remains *optional* as we’ve seen on this thread there are numerous
> approaches to this problem. Its also not immediately obvious that the
> different solutions could be layered.
> 
> Should this be a topic for the next CDM?
> 
> 
>  {.n +       +%  lzwm  b 맲  r  yǩ ׯzX    ܨ}   Ơz &j:+v        zZ+  +zf   h   ~    i   z  w
> ?    & )ߢf
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux