Re: disk enclosure LEDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Yes, although only a tiny part of what tools like ansible do -- and in
> the process, we save the effort of integrating with all of the above.
> IMHO it would actually be better value for money to write our own
> agent than to maintain and test a pluggable infrastructure that could
> use any of them (especially as some have different semantics), and
> handle newer/older versions of them, etc.

Calmari was using salt stack (among other things). I agree with John that Ceph should 
have its own simple story for management. I just hope that it remains *optional* as
we’ve seen on this thread there are numerous approaches to this problem. Its also
not immediately obvious that the different solutions could be layered.

Should this be a topic for the next CDM?


��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux