Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:14:55 +0200: > > > Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice > > than CentOS 5.3 > > Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-) It clearly is the other way round, Red Hat has adopted ours. Let's see if we can pull that one again! >:) Ralph
Attachment:
pgpz33dItqzND.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
