On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: >> AFAIK, this never happened. Is the 5.x.z tree concept dead-before-birth?! > > For CentOS: Yes. > > For Upstream: Ask Red Hat. > > Ralph > I have asked RHT repeatedly to walk me through the life of a package version. Nothing. Jim Wildman _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: release/update question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: release/update question
- From: jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20090602134000.GW12010@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <335932.94013.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090602134000.GW12010@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: release/update question
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- Re: release/update question
- References:
- Re: release/update question
- From: Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
- Re: release/update question
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- Re: release/update question
- Prev by Date: Re: Local Host Routing
- Next by Date: Re: Harware vs Kernel RAID (was Re: External SATA enclosures: SiI3124 and CentOS 5?)
- Previous by thread: Re: release/update question
- Next by thread: Re: release/update question
- Index(es):
 |