jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > > Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: > >> AFAIK, this never happened. Is the 5.x.z tree concept dead-before-birth?! > > > > For CentOS: Yes. > > > > For Upstream: Ask Red Hat. > > I have asked RHT repeatedly to walk me through the life of a package > version. Nothing. AFAIK the "z stream" does not come with your normal RHN subscription. But I don't use RHEL, so I have no idea what it takes to get the .z stuff. One of the reasons CentOS chose not to do it (other reasons are: No SRPMS on public mirrors, too much mirror space would be neede). On the other hand I am not really sure I understand your sentence. Ralph
Attachment:
pgpIJf4UyWJiV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
