Re: release/update question

[Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:14:55 +0200:

> Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
> than CentOS 5.3

Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos