Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:17:35 +0200: > > > One of the reasons CentOS chose not to do it > > It appears that only a very very small number of people need it or *think* > they need it. Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice than CentOS 5.3, as it seems to be not really clear to people that this is not a "new version", but an update to the 5 series. Cheers, Ralph
Attachment:
pgpXHpRUow2hi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
