Re: release/update question

[Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/03/2009 01:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
>> than CentOS 5.3
>
> Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)

I dont think that will be a problem, since we have never been in sync 
with Red Hat's naming scheme.


-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522219@icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos