The other solution is to have it developped. Often, if something cannot be ported for one reason or another, there is no reason not to develop it. If the market/community wishes it to be and has the resources, it will be. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Osvaldo La Rosa" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:10 AM Subject: Re: discussion:Fw: [The vOICe] Linux? Yes, probably I'm agree to explain why I think that ... : On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 11:42:31AM +0200, Doug wrote: > Osvaldo said: > > equival to discriminating people > Sounds like a stretch of the definition to me. Well, does any alternatives already exist, or any other equivalent product? if the answer is: - yes it exists but not for Linux, then I consider that this discriminates me since I only use Linux as os, (and I'm probably not the one and only to do that) - if the answer is no, anyway no alternatives for Linux, then it means the product must be ported, and to port it the community need the code: not giving the code is an empeachment of development of solutions for us, so it reduces my accessibility, it requires that I should continue using a o s taht supports that product, so I feel it as an encouragement for proprietary solutions and a discrimination to people who prefers another choice. > Discriminating: to make a difference in treatment or Thats jsut what I explained. > favor on a basis other than individual merit > <discriminate in favor of your friends> > <discriminate against a certain nationality> This is a strechted vision of the subject I think so. Osvaldo. PS: accepting to gie the code prevents people to hack (sorry to crack) for obtaining the same thing... think about it!!! _______________________________________________ Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list _______________________________________________ Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list