The policy means nothing when the staffing is not there to actually do the tasks. And clearly there is limited staffing. And if they are a volenteer then tell them they arent doing their job and kick them out. Repeat until there is no community and you have no staff. Policy is theory of what should be done, no one ever staffs anything to actually follow the policy fully, so things get dropped. On paid we always get responses in a timely manner, but we are paying for that and have a sla. And often the response is wont fix for one reason or the other.
On Sat, May 30, 2020, 11:45 AM Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2020 11:14:22 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> You really need to understand the devs actual motivations. And your
> are attributing things to Fedora devels that are being funded outside
> of the Fedora community.
Please, think outside the box. It isn't helpful to the discussion, if
you are stuck with your own guesswork of how it may or may not work on
the distribution maker's side. There are actual policies!
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_maintainer_responsibilities/
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
