Re: Fedora 30 EOL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You really need to understand the devs actual motivations.   And your
are attributing things to Fedora devels that are being funded outside
of the Fedora community.

Lenovo will be supporting Fedora on their laptops.  They are the OEM
and will provide the heavy lifting (with enterprise distributions this
is also exactly how it works, the dist vendors *EXPECT* the hardware
vendors to provide the heavy lifting and code.  When the OEM's submit
something to BZ it likely will be a fully done patch, Fedora is not
"supporting" anything formally, that is unless lenovo is funding
people explicitly for that.    They are very likely acting as kernel
developers and/or application developers for the software needed to
support their hardware.  This is how almost all the hardware drivers
come to be written.  The vendor making it writes the drivers, not
generic devs paid by a distribution vendor unless it is in the
distribution vendors self-interest to do so to support a large paying
client.

And both the radeon and nouveau drivers are being done by kernel devs
that are at most only associated with Fedora.   If you look up some of
the various devels they are working for Companies that are using the
hardware themselves internally and are funding the work, or for the
companies that provide the hw.   They have their own self-interest
that just happens to help you.  This is how the entire open source
community was built, most contributers have their own self-interest
first and that self-interest may or may not help you.

They did not do secure boot for the reasons for free distribution
Fedora.  They did secure boot because a number of their paid
enterprise customers require it for some of their environments.   And
the exact same with UEFI, a number of the enterprise customers must
have UEFI, as legacy is going away.  The failed Itanium hardware that
existed in 2003-2010 or so was EFI boot only.   Certain government
contracts also require secure boot, hence those projects got funded.


On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 9:11 AM Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:34 PM Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > those workstations would be the expensive cards.  A yearly redhat
> > support license is enough that no one is going to buy one for a $1000
> > machine because in 3 years that license will cost more than the HW, so
> > the "cheap" hardware that is being discussed like any of us would use
> > isn't something they will likely run into in the enterprise market.
> > There is a significant amount of HW used on this list that they simply
> > will never be supporting on the enterprise end.
>
> You really need to keep up.  For many years Fedora devs (kernel, and
> bios) have spearheaded the effort to make Linux in general, and Fedora
> specifically a priority on desktops and laptops.  Tremendous amount of
> work went into the kernel and UEFI compatibility, particularly the way
> M$ was pushing for "secure boot".  So much so, Fedora kernels were
> controversially secure boot compatible earlier due to a (digital)
> signing agreement with M$.  Fedora has also contributed significantly
> in making FOSS radeon drivers reliable, and advanced noveau despite
> hostility from NVidia.
>
> As for recent developments, if Fedora doesn't want to support regular
> installs, how come ThinkPads are going to be shipped by Lenovo with
> Fedora pre-installed?
>
>   https://fedoramagazine.org/coming-soon-fedora-on-lenovo-laptops/
>
> And you still haven't read the BZ I linked in my OP, and going on and
> on about hypothetical scenarios.  Please inform yourself better.
>
> --
> Suvayu
>
> Open source is the future. It sets us free.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux