On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:45:46PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:25:48 +0200 > Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > (which mainly means that koji doesn't tag task build failures for > > these archs as fatal, doesn't sound too difficult to implement). > > Oh gee, thanks for completely missing the work needed here and > trivializing all that we're trying to do. That's so helpful. Gee, why > couldn't we have this done yesterday. It's so clear to me now. I'm sorry, I didn't want to step on anybody's toes, but from the bird's view it does seem quite that trivial, yes. Wasn't that was "secondary arch" politely means? Allow the build to go to valhalla and have a SIG worry itself sick instead of all non-ppc users out here? Wasn't that the state of the build system before ppc64 entered as a primary arch? Implementation looks trivial, politics probably not. So take the above with your grain of salt. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpR5bkfFLbVa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
