On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:24:46AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > But we're not talking about a secondary arch, we're talking about a > primary arch. Like it or not, ppc (and thus ppc64) is a primary arch > set and must addressed just like the other primary arches. Are you sure, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Meetings/2007-06-12 Maybe someone should look again in the logs, the summary says: # PPC will remain a primary architecture until: 1. secondary arch process is finalized 2. there are no other secondary architectures # Board approves and welcomes ARM as a secondary architecture item 2. was already fulfilled by the same board meeting, so the above boils down to: # ppc and arm will become secondary archs once the infrastructure/process is in place So they already are secondary archs waiting for the implementation (which mainly means that koji doesn't tag task build failures for these archs as fatal, doesn't sound too difficult to implement). We now have the 1% gain for 100% pain situation the secondary arch proposal wanted to avoid. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpMDxLhnnKZ0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
