On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:11:56 +0200 Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And yes, the buildsystem is not capable to handle secondary arch, > that's my speech, e.g. this is a reuqest to implement this sooner than > later to not have packagers do the exclude/include jumbo. The work to > support secondary archs is needed anyway, and doing it now will save > lots of specfile messing. But we're not talking about a secondary arch, we're talking about a primary arch. Like it or not, ppc (and thus ppc64) is a primary arch set and must addressed just like the other primary arches. As for secondary arches, the current proposal would not stop you from building your package if the build fails on the secondary arch. It's up to the secondary arch team to either get your build working, or work with you to insert an ExcludeArch. But it doesn't have to be done immediately to get your primary update out. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
