Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > But we're not talking about a secondary arch, we're talking about a > primary arch. Like it or not, ppc (and thus ppc64) is a primary arch > set and must addressed just like the other primary arches. I really find it troublesome that anyone thinks they shouldn't be primary. If the only primary arches are x86/x86_64, then packagers will basically not have any forcing function to make them worry about whether the code is portable to any non-Intel platform. I think that at minimum we need a bigendian arch or two in the primary set, just so that there's at least a token requirement for portability. Else the secondary arches are *all* doomed to failure in the long run. regards, tom lane -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
