Re: Dealing with ppc64 BRs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:58:50AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Once upon a time Monday 06 August 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when ppc64 is missing some BRs the builds fail. I feel like it's
> > overshooting to start having ExclusiveArchs/ExlcudeArchs, but maybe
> > that's the way one needs to go with modern build systems ... :/
> >
> > More concrete mediawiki BR-depends on ocaml and that seems not to
> > exist on ppc64 booming all builds. What's the proper way to fix this?
> 
> Get what you need built fpr ppc64.

?

Should I volunteer to maintain package foo and bar on ppc64 becasue
they are BRs to my baz?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpXiLWyzewKG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux