Re: Dealing with ppc64 BRs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:01:44 +0200
Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:58:50AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Once upon a time Monday 06 August 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > when ppc64 is missing some BRs the builds fail. I feel like it's
> > > overshooting to start having ExclusiveArchs/ExlcudeArchs, but maybe
> > > that's the way one needs to go with modern build systems ... :/
> > >
> > > More concrete mediawiki BR-depends on ocaml and that seems not to
> > > exist on ppc64 booming all builds. What's the proper way to fix this?
> > 
> > Get what you need built fpr ppc64.
> 
> ?
> 
> Should I volunteer to maintain package foo and bar on ppc64 becasue
> they are BRs to my baz?

David was working on ocaml at one point.  For now, ExcludeArch it and
file the appropriate ExcludeArch bug.  When ocaml is built, you can
remove it and rebuild.

josh

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux