Re: Make ppc64 secondary arch - don't block builds (was: Dealing with ppc64 BRs)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:16:06 +0100
Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Bugs found when chasing down portability problems are often real bugs,
> not just non-portable code.  For that reason, 100% of our users
> benefit from portable code, not just the 1% who use minor
> architectures.  It's in everyone's interest that Fedora code is real C
> (or C++).

But when that bug doesn't effect the majority of our user base, do
those users really care?  Should the?  Yes.  Do they?  No.  "It works
for me and my major arch, why should I care that it broke on your silly
arch?"

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux