On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 03:06:45 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:34:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:15:04 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:43:46PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > > > > which is just the same as not having any disttags at all and led to > > > > > > > the pain before the disttag. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's painless. Package is only updated when somebody maintains it. > > > > > > > > > > We hope all packages are maintained. :) > > > > > > > > > > Just introduce a package into FC6 and F7. And then have a security > > > > > update. You start juggling around with reserving build tags like > > > > > > > > > > foo-1.2.3-1 (fc6) > > > > > foo-1.2.3-2 (f7) > > > > > > > > > > fix: > > > > > > > > > > foo-1.2.3-3 (fc6) > > > > > foo-1.2.3-4 (f7) > > > > > > > > or: > > > > > > > > foo-1.2.3-1.1 (fc6) > > > > foo-1.2.3-2.1 (f7) > > > > > > > > foo-1.2.3-1.3 (fc6) > > > > foo-1.2.3-2.2 (f7) > > > > > > > > foo-1.2.3-1.4 (fc6) > > > > foo-1.2.3-2.2 (f7) > > > > > > > > It has worked fine for many package maintainers for many years. > > > > > > Don't talk about yourself in plural and in the 3rd person. ;) See bottom. > > Keep moving closer to a "plonk" for this list. ;) > > Yes, Your Higness. I shall keep His remark firmly noted. ;) > > > > The above makes no real sense whatsoever, > > > > Why? > > Because the minor integers seem to be assigned quite randomly and even > the last nevr is the same as the previous on in the second group. So > you have at least a typo and the number still make no sense. It does. > > > you have effectively reverted the order of buildids and disttags. > > > > Elaborate. > > You use "-1.", "-2.", "-3." as disttags. The scheme above does not even know what a dist tag is. It is a pure package release based scheme. > But not I should elaborate on > your choice of manual integer fiddling, you should! In your view, a spec is exactly the same for all dist releases. In this scheme, it need not be the same. > Come on give us a break. Or a plonk. "us"? -- This message reminded me of a certain thread of fab-list from March this year. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
