On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:03:47PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > It could be either one: A scheduled deadline in the roadmap with a request > to maintainers to [at least] try rebuilding their packages once in a given > period. Or a mass-rebuild like those Matt Domsch has done separately, but > which publishes successful rebuilds in rawhide and collects build failure > logs somewhere. In either case, I would prefer if the maintainers or > co-maintainers had to push a button in that procedure. Such an attempt at > touching/updating packages early, e.g. right in time before test1, is not > to be understood as a freeze or final rebuild. It's just an event to > test how many packages still build. And also have a possibility to test those rebuilt packages before the release such that some time for testing is left, but it is sufficiently late such that the build environment is somehow stabilized. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
