On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:51:31PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2007 20:46:52 Axel Thimm wrote: > > So do a rebuild for test1. > > Which is well before the feature freeze and thus not really suitable for what > you're trying to accomplish. Well, that was a reply to some comments from Michael which w/o a quote I can't even remember if it was ironic or meant that way. But if it were in my powers I'd have every test release be a full rebuild. Give the masses something to really test, don't spread the OS's age over several different build environments. FWIW ATrpms may be 1/10th of Fedora's size, but that's what ATrpms does for a couple of releases: Mass rebuilds for every test release. And bugs just show up waiting to be squashed. Why not squash Fedora's bugs just the same? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpCGTWf0bYW7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
