Warren Togami wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
What's the failure point here now?
As for the import process, we can change how that works - instead
of CVSSyncNeeded, for example, we could just, after APPROVED, assign
the review bug to the CVS admins to do the magic, at which point they
assign it back to the owner to do the initial import/build. Is this
a better interface for users?
Folks seem to be confused by the ASSIGNED bouncing around.
Did I misread your last version (top post of this thread) isn't the
ASSIGNED bouncing around no more in this version?
? I am
currently thinking about potential ways to improve the review process to
remove this confusion. A big legitimate problem with changing ASSIGNED
is that it must be done manually, which is too easy to not happen
because it is not obvious.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded
I made some changes to this page in an attempt to simplify this
temporary process until we have the PackageDB online. Unfortunately, I
suspect even this simplified process is too complicated.
1. Request new package and branch.
2. Wait until somebody creates empty directories and edits owners.list.
3. Owner checks stuff in and builds.
Perhaps a better idea than setting ASSIGNED to the CVS admins is to have
a fedora-cvs flag? Theoretical process:
1) Review is complete, fedora-review+
2) Owner writes in the Bugzilla comment something like:
<Branches> <PackageName> <FedoraAccountName> <BugName>
FC-5 FC-6 foopackage bobjoe bobjoebugzilla@xxxxxxxxx
3) Set fedora-cvs flag
4) CVS Admins get e-mail about fedora-cvs flag. All context of the
review is within the bug itself. Admin creates CVS directories and sets
owner. Removes fedora-cvs flag. (This is especially nice because CVS
admin queue can be seen by a bugzilla query.)
5) Owner checks in and builds.
Effectively, this fedora-cvs flag eliminates the need for CVSSyncNeeded
entirely. You could also use the fedora-cvs flag with explicitly
instructions within any bug to do special requests, like:
"Please remove audacious-itouch. We made some mistake. Blah blah."
Thoughts?
I really dislike needing to ask a CVS admin in for anything, IMHO this
needing a CVS-admin for initial import is a serious regression, can't we
think of some other way to get this fixed? I never liked the manual
requesting of CVS-branches and now things have been made worse.
Regards,
Hans
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
