Re: libxml v1 dependencies (was: Re: multilib fun - devel packages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Christopher Blizzard wrote:

On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 21:27 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
Until there is a clear signal that the definition of Core has changed
direction I'm not going to be working under the single CD goal
assumption.  Someone is going to have the balls to move KDE and some
of that java crap over to Extras if you have a chance in hell of going
to one CD.  I'll pay more attention to this argument as a serious
statement of policy direction once I see KDE move over.

I'll fall on my sword and say that I think that moving KDE out to extras
is a good idea - but probably not for the reason you expect.  Since it's
clear that Red Hat is not going to be supporting KDE (we're just not
going to put up the resources) let's stop holding it hostage and invite
the KDE community who cares about it to develop and support it as part
of Extras.  We can give them a lot of freedom to make it look nice and
work the way that they think it should.  (Kedora?)

+100

Letting KDE enthusiastics package it the way they think it should be done in Extras instead of having them whining about "RH shipping broken KDE" is probably going to gain more friends than you lose by dropping it out of Core.

	- Panu -


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux