On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:38:55AM +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 23:57 -0500, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > > I think your setting yourself up for only one possible answer here. I > > wouldn't say it's about the functionality. It's a question of > > priorities. In this case, is keeping the functionality worth the cost > > of carrying most of the Gtk 1.2 + Old Ass Gnome stack? I think that's > > how we need to frame the question. > > Of course, we do basically nothing with Gtk 1.2 and gnome 1.x, so the > cost is basically just the size of the packages on the CDs. Well I would feel way better if we weren't shipping devel packages for what I know as broken, deprecated for nearly 4 years code base. Ship the library if you really want it, but please drop the -devel from the CDs, I really really don't want to take the risk of people accidentally using it. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
