I think your setting yourself up for only one possible answer here. I wouldn't say it's about the functionality. It's a question of priorities. In this case, is keeping the functionality worth the cost of carrying most of the Gtk 1.2 + Old Ass Gnome stack? I think that's how we need to frame the question. --Chris On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 20:56 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > I'm not suggesting we move it as a target issue, I'm suggesting we move > > it as a legacy software w/ no good replacement. I can't help that there > > is no good replacement at this time. It could be a temporary move to > > Extras until such time the gtk2 version is ready for use. > > I don't buy this logic - if the functionality is that important, it should > stay; if the functionality isn't, it should go. > > Bill > > -- > Fedora-maintainers mailing list > Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
